It’s a shame that it’s taken Iain Duncan Smith six years to realise government is benefiting the richest rather than working people or the disabled, but better late than never says GMB.
GMB has commented on the resignation of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Iain Duncan Smith over cuts to disability benefits in the budget announced on Wednesday,16 March 2016. (See notes to editors for a copy a Press Association story with Iain Duncan Smith’s resignation letter in full).
In his resignation letter to Prime Minister David Cameron, Iain Duncan Smith described the £1.3 billion pounds in cuts to disability benefits as “a compromise too far”.
Tim Roache, GMB General Secretary, said “It’s a shame that it’s taken Iain Duncan Smith six years to get his head round the fact that the government is benefiting the richest, rather than working people, let alone the disabled. But, better late than never.”
Contact: Kamaljeet Jandu on 07956 237178 or Lisa Johnson on 07900 392228 or Brian Strutton on 07860 606137 or Martin Smith on 07974 251722 or GMB press office on 07970 863411 or 07739 182691
Notes to editors
PA story dated Friday 18th March 2016
Iain Duncan Smith has stepped down as Work and Pensions Secretary in protest at the Government's planned cuts to disability benefits.
The former Conservative Party leader announced his resignation from the Cabinet post in a letter to Prime Minister David Cameron.
Here is the letter in full:
"I am incredibly proud of the welfare reforms that the Government has delivered over the last five years. Those reforms have helped to generate record rates of employment and in particular a substantial reduction in workless households.
"As you know, the advancement of social justice was my driving reason for becoming part of your ministerial team and I continue to be grateful to you for giving me the opportunity to serve.
"You have appointed good colleagues to my department who I have enjoyed working with. It has been a particular privilege to work with excellent civil servants and the outstanding Lord Freud and other ministers including my present team, throughout all of my time at the Department of Work and Pensions.
"I truly believe that we have made changes that will greatly improve the life chances of the most disadvantaged people in this country and increase their opportunities to thrive. A nation's commitment to the least advantaged should include the provision of a generous safety-net but it should also include incentive structures and practical assistance programmes to help them live independently of the state.
"Together, we've made enormous strides towards building a system of social security that gets the balance right between state help and self help.
"Throughout these years, because of the perilous public finances we inherited from the last Labour administration, difficult cuts have been necessary. I have found some of these cuts easier to justify than others but aware of the economic situation and determined to be a team player I have accepted their necessity.
"You are aware that I believe the cuts would have been even fairer to younger families and people of working age if we had been willing to reduce some of the benefits given to better-off pensioners but I have attempted to work within the constraints that you and the Chancellor set.
"I have for some time and rather reluctantly come to believe that the latest changes to benefits to the disabled and the context in which they've been made are, a compromise too far. While they are defensible in narrow terms, given the continuing deficit, they are not defensible in the way they were placed within a Budget that benefits higher earning taxpayers. They should have instead been part of a wider process to engage others in finding the best way to better focus resources on those most in need.
"I am unable to watch passively whilst certain policies are enacted in order to meet the fiscal self imposed restraints that I believe are more and more perceived as distinctly political rather than in the national economic interest. Too often my team and I have been pressured in the immediate run up to a budget or fiscal event to deliver yet more reductions to the working age benefit bill.
"There has been too much emphasis on money saving exercises and not enough awareness from the Treasury, in particular, that the government's vision of a new welfare-to-work system could not be repeatedly salami-sliced.
"It is therefore with enormous regret that I have decided to resign.
"You should be very proud of what this government has done on deficit reduction, corporate competitiveness, education reforms and devolution of power. I hope as the government goes forward you can look again, however, at the balance of the cuts you have insisted upon and wonder if enough has been done to ensure 'we are all in this together'."