LOCAL GOVERNMENT CRAFT WORKERS PAY OFFER 2025/26 – STILL NO PROGRESS!
Posted on:
Dear Colleague
Further to my May 2025 Bulletin and the August 2025 update on the GMB notice board below where I advised you that following submission of our pay claim, also below, the National Employers made the following full and final one year offer:
- With effect from 1 April 2025, an increase of 3.20% on basic salary
- With effect from 1 April 2025, an increase of 3.20% on all allowances (as listed in the 2024 JNC pay agreement circular dated 1 November 2024)
The other elements of the claim asking for
- A shorter working week
- An increase in Annual Leave
- JNC Craft Apprentice pay rates
were all rejected.
In a subsequent ballot GMB members voted to accept the offer but Unite members voted to reject it as they were unhappy with the potential grading of the Building Labourer, the use of apprentices and the potential use of job evaluation. Since then, there has been much to-ing and fro-ing between Unite and the employers, the former insisting that they would never accept the offer and the employers insisting it is a full and final offer.
Unite have advised that they will take industrial action in pursuit of their demands.
In recent correspondence (8th June 2026), the employers reiterate that the offer made on 22 April 2025 is full and final.
Regarding Building Labourer grade the employers state that
“the 2016-18 JNC agreement aligned the five Craft Grades to pay points 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively on the NJC ‘Green Book’ pay spine. On 1 April 2026, NJC pay point 2 was permanently deleted, meaning from that date NJC pay point 3 is the bottom pay point. As a result, the Building Labourer grade JNC-specific rate of pay must by necessity align with NJC pay point 3 from 1 April 2026.
However, we have been unable to find a single Craftworker employed as a Building Labourer on a JNC-specific rate. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, the deletion of pay point 2 from the NJC spine on 1 April 2026 has had no impact whatsoever on any individual Craft employee”.
The employers add
“that if Unite was able to provide an example of a Building Labourer currently employed directly by a council on the specific JNC Craft 2024 pay rate of £23,656 per annum (£453.68 per week), the National Employers would be willing to discuss with the employer[s] the appropriate action it needed to take.”
The employers reiterate that
“there is nothing in the employers’ offer that will unpick existing local arrangements on this issue.”
Regarding JNC Craft Apprentices the employers state
“In councils in which Craft Apprentices are employed we have been unable to find any who are being paid on the specific rates of pay set out in the most recent JNC pay circular (dated 1 November 2024). The employers therefore see no purpose in the JNC continuing to update and publish pay rates that are not being used.
However, as with the Building Labourer grade issue, if Unite is able to identify any council employer that is paying an apprentice on the JNC rates, we will be pleased to advise that employer.”
On 12th June 2026 Unite responded to the above stating that the employers are misrepresenting the position. They say
“We are agreed on the Building Labourer Grade moving to Pay Point 3” and are clear “that if all grades are not moved up, we will have, for the purposes of a standard set nationally, a new entrant on the same banding as a qualified, competent Craft Worker. We cannot accept this and your suggestion to resolve this through job evaluation going forward is equally unacceptable.”
Unite continue
“The Agreement establishes the benchmark upon which regional and local bargaining can build. That includes apprentices within the bargaining unit and supports progression through industry. I remain unconvinced by any argument that apprentices should be excluded from those arrangements. Indeed, the fact that some may benefit from higher locally negotiated rates only reinforces the value of retaining them within the nationally agreed structure.
The suggestion that apprentices should be removed from the bargaining unit simply because some may receive higher rates through local agreements is neither logical nor consistent with the purpose of the Agreement.
I am unsure why this commonsense position, that has been in place since the Agreement came into practice, cannot be agreed going forward. This appears to be part of a wider attempt to introduce job evaluation as the preferred mechanism for determining rates. That position was clearly communicated by the National Employers in August and, despite the concerns raised …there has, to date, been no indication that this position has changed.”
Finally, earlier today, we have been notified of further correspondence from the employers, where they reiterate that Unite’s
“…unnecessary action serves only to further delay all Craftworkers, whether union members or not, from receiving their long overdue 2025/26 pay award”.
They continue
“Since making their offer, the employers have reaffirmed to Unite numerous times …that their offer is full and final. The National Employers see no reason for Craftworkers to receive a different pay offer from the ones made to (and accepted by) the other local government bargaining groups (NJC for local government services; JNCs for Chief Officers and Chief Executives), all of whom received their 3.20 per cent 2025/26 pay awards almost a year ago.
“The National Employers have been consistently clear with Unite that nothing in their offer will unpick existing local working arrangements with regard to the two “non-pay” elements: the Building Labourer grade and JNC Craft Apprentices. In any council in which a Building Labourer is employed on a local rate of pay, they will remain on that rate of pay (subject to the proposed 3.20 per cent increase) and the differential between that employee’s role – and pay rate - and other Craft roles / pay will remain, as now, entirely a matter for local determination.”
“The National Employers, contrary to Unite’s messaging to its members, are not seeking to ‘impose a job evaluation process without agreement.’ There is no mechanism by which the national employers could do so. However, the employers’ opinion that Craftworkers should be included in local pay and grading reviews is of longstanding (almost 30 years, since Single Status was introduced in 1997), so should not come as a surprise to anyone”.
“In councils in which Craft Apprentices are employed, we have been unable to find any who are being paid on the specific rates of pay set out in the most recent JNC pay circular (dated 1 November 2024). The employers therefore see no purpose in the JNC continuing to update and publish pay rates that are not being used. This does not mean…that the employers are proposing the ‘unilateral removal of the apprentice structure from union agreements.”
“The National Employers want to be able to pay JNC Craftworkers the same 3.20 per cent increase that other local government employees received almost a year ago. We hope local Unite members – none of whom to the best of our knowledge will be impacted by either of the two issues above – will urge their national officials to end this dispute so the 2025 pay award can finally be implemented.”
Whilst the above is being played out GMB members are frustratingly waiting for their pay award - and the 12 months back pay that will come with it – to be implemented. We are also ready to commence the 2026/27 pay talks which remain outstanding.
I remain in contact with the employers and Unite urging them both to move forward on this issue.
George Georgiou
GMB National Officer Local Government Craft Workers

