GMB Union are not re-engaging with NHS Pay Review Body for the 2026/27 pay round
Posted on:
Following GMB’s rejection of the NHS 25/26 Pay Award, GMB’s National NHS and Ambulance Committees met to discuss our position on pay for 2026/27.
We met with the Secretary of State, Wes Streeting, on Monday 11 August to discuss pay and issues of significant importance to GMB members.
Please read the full update below
GMB Representatives meet with Secretary of State, Wes Streeting – NHS Pay
Following the meeting all reps felt that they were listened to regarding the important issues that affect GMB members, however, pay discussions have not been reopened.
Although GMB members who participated in the consultative ballot voted to reject the pay award for 2025/26, we did not have the turnout of member votes to move to a formal postal ballot for industrial action.
GMB are now focusing efforts on pay for 2026/27 and the essential NHS structural reform that is needed which must be backed by sufficient funding from ministers.
After discussion, debate and vote, GMB have decided not to re-engage with the PRB for the upcoming pay round.
The vote was unanimous that we would not be engaging with the PRB due to a lack of trust and confidence in the process and that it has not delivered for GMB members. GMB's position has always been that if are not happy with the outcome of reforms or lack of progress; we may choose to withdraw.
All but one of the NHS unions have also announced they will not participate in the next pay review body process for 2026/27 due to a lack of staff trust and confidence in the current pay process, which is not fit for purpose. The current process which involves the pay review body (PRB) is time-consuming and a more efficient approach is needed for the coming year.
The NHS unions have written to advise the government that the PRB is not working for us and is not fit for purpose and has asked them to provide sufficient funding and investment to negotiate pay and structure reforms for 2026/27.
You can read the press announcement here:
Ministers must make good on NHS pay-talk promises, say health unions
Health unions are calling on the government to get on with promised direct talks to get wage structures right and deliver pay awards on time, they say today (Friday).
The 14 unions representing staff on 'Agenda for Change' contracts within the NHS have written jointly to health secretary Wes Streeting urging him to honour a commitment made last year to tackle problems in the pay system that are harming staffing and morale.
Given the delay, unions say these talks should now be widened to also include the headline pay award for 2026, which would need to be decided early next year if it is to be paid on time in April, as ministers have committed to do.
Unions say staff trust and confidence in the current pay process, involving a time-consuming pay review body (PRB), has hit rock bottom and a more efficient approach is needed for the coming year.
That means setting aside the PRB process and focusing efforts on comprehensive talks backed by sufficient investment from ministers to allow a deal to be reached, the unions say. This must be enough to cover the cost of reforming pay bands and an acceptable pay increase.
Hardworking staff need to see the government values them and understands their cost-of-living struggles, say the health unions.
Most NHS workers received a pay rise this year that was significantly lower than the one given to doctors and dentists, and which has now slipped below the level of inflation.
The unions – representing more than a million NHS workers – say discontent with the 2025 pay award and the broken promises on talks have “heightened industrial tension” and time is running out.
As a result all but one of the NHS unions have today announced they will not participate in the next pay review body process for 2026/27.
This year’s pay rise of 3.6% was lower than almost all public sector wage increases decided through pay review bodies. And with CPI inflation standing at 3.8%, unions point out pay is being outstripped by the rising cost of living.
The unions say this is further evidence of how the current pay review body (PRB) process is not fit for purpose.
Meanwhile, problems have mounted with the current Agenda for Change system put in place two decades ago, but the absence of regular negotiations means these have not been addressed. Pay bands need to be adjusted to ensure skills and responsibilities are correctly rewarded, the unions point out.
They say it makes little sense to tackle pay rises and structural adjustments separately when a streamlined process would be more efficient.
In their letter the unions say of this year’s rise: “Far from being what the government claimed to be an ‘above-inflation award’, it is in fact a real-terms cut as things stand.
“This has done nothing to boost workforce morale or generate the goodwill needed to deliver the government’s much-needed NHS recovery plan."
The unions say they will focus their efforts on pushing for extra “meaningful funding” to reform Agenda for Change, in addition to ensuring NHS workers get the decent pay rise they deserve.
Chair of the NHS unions and UNISON head of health Helga Pile said: “The government promised talks over a year ago and they still haven't got round the table with unions with any proper plan to sort things out.
“The only way to get a system that’s fit for purpose and meets the needs of staff in a modern health service is to fix the structure at the same time as making sure staff can cope with the cost of living.
"Some things need sorting urgently while others will take longer to work through. But the important thing is that we agree a plan and get the funding needed to reach a deal.
“The health secretary wants a more efficient system and that begins with getting pay right. Tackling this now will help to deliver the pay rise when it’s due in April rather than kicking the can down the road leaving staff with months of delays.”
Secretary to the NHS unions and assistant director for employment relations at the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Jim Fahie said: “The government's failure to honour the structural reform commitment for the 2025/26 pay year, alongside a lower pay award than other PRB groups, has led to high levels of dissatisfaction among our members.
“Our collective efforts are focused on securing a fair annual uplift in pay for our members and for separate funding to be provided for Agenda for Change (AfC) structural reform.